Review-Rolex The History of the Rolex Cosmograph part IV The Sapphire Era

In 1988, Rolex introduced a new Daytona to replace the not so popular manual wound 6263/5. The new Daytona ref. 16520 had a similar design but with some major improvements. Here are the two models side by side: very similar, yet different…

 

The two generations of Cosmographs (Photo Ed Delgado)

 

The biggest improvement was the new 4030 self winding movement based on the Zenith El Primero, which originally oscillated at 36,000 beats per hour but has been regulated to 28,800 by Rolex. This provided Rolex with an incredible accurate chronograph, which was also up to chronometer standards.

 

 

The Rolex Cal. 4030

 

The other noticeable improvements were the sapphire crystal, the new crown guards and the new dial/subdial layout. The bezel was now only offered in steel. This new attractive dial combination including the added bonus of a self winding movement was a big hit among Rolex customers and created a huge revival of the vintage Daytonas.

 ,www.chronoonhere.com;

Lets’ now focus on the evolution of the watch during its 12 years of production. While the movement and case have remained unchanged,www.greatsalewatch.com, there have been several dials and bezels variations.

 

The dials

 

Mk1

 

This is common in the early watches and is one of the more desirable configurations with the word "Cosmograph" located lower in the dial or Floating Cosmograph.   As a matter of fact, the whole text "ROLEX, Oyster Perpetual, Superlative Chronometer" is situated lower than the later dials. The subdials use a rounded and smaller font. In the hour totalizer, the number six is inverted and appears as a "9" and not as the intended "6".  This "defect" appeared in dials as late as 1994-5. The minute totalizer, has four "dash" markings between five minute markers as opposed to later dials which only had three "dash" marks. This is a tritium dial and is labeled as "T SWISS T" at the six o’clock position. This dial configuration was made for about one year.

 

mk1 dial for Cosmograph ref. 16520 (Photo A. Shear)

 

Mk2

 

The major difference on this watch was the word "Officially Certified" was left out of the dial even though the watch was rated as a chronometer. The word "Cosmograph" was now together with the rest of the writing on the top of the dial. The subdials contained the same characteristics as the Mk1 dial. This dial configuration was also made for about one year.

 

mk2 dial for Cosmograph ref. 16520 (Photo Ed Delgado)

 

Mk3

 

The subdial fonts still has the inverted "6"s in the hour totalizer, the words "OFFICIALLY CERTIFIED" reappears on the dial again.

 

 

mk3 dial for Cosmograph ref. 16520  

 Mk4

 

This dial was the most commonly used dial used on the 16520 and therefore the one usually associated with the watch. This dial the writing was all together and was situated slightly higher than the early dials. The fonts in all the subdials changed to a more square and bold font was easier to read. As mentioned above, less "hash" marks were noted in the minute totalizers.

 

mk4 dial for Cosmograph ref. 16520 (Photo Karl)

 ,www.timeonhere.com;

Mk5

 

This is the same dial as the Mark 4 dial but in 1999 (A) till the end of production in 2000 (P), luminova was used in the markers. Therefore, the dials did not have the "T SWISS T" and instead it was labelled as "SWISS" at the six o’clock position. The hands are also luminova.

 

mk5 dial for Cosmograph ref. 16520 (Photo Ed Delgado)

 

 

The bezels

 

There have been three types of bezels during the years:

 

- The first bezel on the ref. 16520 was engraved until 200 and the word "UNITS  PER HOUR" was located at three o’clock.

- The second type of bezel was engraved until 400, the words "UNITS  PER HOUR" was located at one o clock

- This last type of bezel is similar to the previous one, but 240 is noted and 225 and 250 are missing.

 

In 2000, the Cosmsograph is upgraded again and the new reference 116520 is powered by an inhouse movement, has a new dial design, a new case finishing etc…But this is not history yet ;-)

 

 

Acknowledgements: Ed Delgado

 

===
For Jeff’s original post in Rolex forum, please CLICK HERE

Tags: ,

Comments are closed.